Dyno tuned.CAI, cat back, venomous pulley

tumblr_m0po0rxWuq1qa2vf3o1_1280.jpg
 
viperhauler said:
the graph seems overlaid, but the times are less than 11 minutes apart...

it's doubtful you'd install a catback, cai, pulley, and an sct in 11 minutes, so i'm not sure how that translates...

to load a tune takes about 5 minutes by itself, and that assumes there's no adjustments needed after the first "try"...
Click to expand...

Im not a tuner, just the driver. All the aftermarket parts were already on the truck. Just tuning was done. I'm not sure if you are saying the sheet is a fake or what.
 
Think he spends too much time in the other forums and believes their leader too much, lol. Great results, and the fact you showed the results bud. Congrats as butt dynos don't lie :)
 
Atleast you ran on a Mustang only accurate dyno out there, If you wanna feel good about your self add 8% to your numbers and say you ran on a dynojet.. LOL..
 
Dont worry bout the numbers. If you feel a difference that's what counts. And for anyone who doesn't believe it, the track will prove it.
 
Dyno numbers don't mean shit it is a tool to tune with plain and simple. Ill see you on the return road heading to the staging lanes.


Sent from my iPhone 6 while driving 100 mph on a dirt road
 
dcapita said:
Im not a tuner, just the driver. All the aftermarket parts were already on the truck. Just tuning was done. I'm not sure if you are saying the sheet is a fake or what.
Click to expand...

He wasn't saying that at all. He was merely pointing out what was said on the sheet.

No one here is questioning your gains. They are exactly what is expected with your mods.

You overall numbers are artificially high, but that varies greatly from dyno to dyne. Regardless, I bet your truck is way more fun to drive since you got it tuned.


VENOMOUS1 RACING said:
Think he spends too much time in the other forums and believes their leader too much, lol. Great results, and the fact you showed the results bud. Congrats as butt dynos don't lie :)
Click to expand...
Dan is one the two most objective posters on this forum. I'll shoot you a text ;)
 
Last edited:
dcapita said:
Im not a tuner, just the driver. All the aftermarket parts were already on the truck. Just tuning was done. I'm not sure if you are saying the sheet is a fake or what.
Click to expand...

No... I believe the sheet, but I didn't know what was the difference in the two runs that was only 11 minutes apart... I was under the impression that you installed the mods the same day and I couldn't see how you could do that in that short amount of time...
 
VENOMOUS1 RACING said:
Think he spends too much time in the other forums and believes their leader too much, lol...
Click to expand...

you ought to know me well enough by now that i can draw my own conclusions..

you also (of all people) should know that no damn stock qc with a tune and a catback is knocking out almost 500 hp to the tires on a mustang dyno...
 
let me clarify: i think the mods could have added about 40 hp. but i think your baseline dyno was high, therefore skewing your numbers...

most qc's with longtube headers, no cats, exhaust, tune, coils, wires, etc. (basically full bolt ons) are only putting on average 460hp and 490tq to the tires on a dynojet... that's the fact...

i just didn't want you (OP) to think you got some freak and are running around in a 500 hp truck to the tires...

and what i'm MORE concerned about is what this tuner is doing to get those numbers so high... if he's playing with the numbers, or doing something wrong, and you decide to put spray on it and he tunes it improperly, and it blows up, wouldn't you have wanted the other thousand people who own trucks and have done this before to bring up the fact that something MIGHT be wrong? on a dynojet those numbers would be about 520/550 to the tires - something only folks with heads/cam, spray, or a roe are getting... something doesn't seem right...

but contrary to my sigline, i don't know everything... this is purely a hypothesis... i'm not trying to kick you in the balls by any means, so please don't take it that way...
 
Actually any Dyno operator would use same settings in run file and therefore whether his numbers are accurate HP/TQ are dead nuts or not doesn't matter. The FACT that he gained the power with same settings and correction factor doesn't lie.:rock: Again, dynos aren't for numbers, or 1/4 mile passes (SRT10Venomous, lmfao)!! It is to replicate driving on the road and giving the tuner ability to fine tune by feedback and logging from a WIDE BAND O2 sensor as was done in this instance.
And I got mad love for you Danny boy! Don't think I don't fool:D
 
viperhauler said:
let me clarify: i think the mods could have added about 40 hp. but i think your baseline dyno was high, therefore skewing your numbers...

most qc's with longtube headers, no cats, exhaust, tune, coils, wires, etc. (basically full bolt ons) are only putting on average 460hp and 490tq to the tires on a dynojet... that's the fact...

i just didn't want you (OP) to think you got some freak and are running around in a 500 hp truck to the tires...

and what i'm MORE concerned about is what this tuner is doing to get those numbers so high... if he's playing with the numbers, or doing something wrong, and you decide to put spray on it and he tunes it improperly, and it blows up, wouldn't you have wanted the other thousand people who own trucks and have done this before to bring up the fact that something MIGHT be wrong? on a dynojet those numbers would be about 520/550 to the tires - something only folks with heads/cam, spray, or a roe are getting... something doesn't seem right...

but contrary to my sigline, i don't know everything... this is purely a hypothesis... i'm not trying to kick you in the balls by any means, so please don't take it that way...
Click to expand...

I don't know enough about these trucks to dispute the #s. I know the guy that did the tuning has experience with other viper engines including the twin turbo one in his shop. He did my buddies 10 sec G8 and a lot of very strong builds.

Don't hate because I make more power than you!!! LOL
 
trussman said:
times are what count. What is yur best 1/4 and 1/8th times and trap? I can't get the times page to work.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure Dan went 8.3 on worn out streets. Also, it's worth nothing that was on the stock clutch setup and shifter (for those of you who insist the stock stuff sucks ;) )
 
dcapita said:
Just a joke there Danny boy! Nice truck by the way.
Click to expand...
it was... but then she wanted to go toe to toe with the jersey wall on the highway... :eek: but she'll soon be back... with a new dress;)
trussman said:
times are what count. What is yur best 1/4 and 1/8th times and trap? I can't get the times page to work.
Click to expand...
mine? i'm embarrassed to say out of damn near an off the wall guess of 300 passes down the 8th, i've never got to get her down the 1/4... my best street tire run was 8.31, and i think it was 86.XX mph... that's full weight, toyo street tires, full air pressure, full tank of gas, and a 1.9XX 60'... same thing i'd pull my trailer with... it was a solid mid 12 100k+ mile work truck:D

caveman said:
Pretty sure Dan went 8.3 on worn out streets. Also, it's worth nothing that was on the stock clutch setup and shifter (for those of you who insist the stock stuff sucks ;) )
Click to expand...

nothing wrong with stock... if it ain't broke... then you have no excuse... it's a driver mod;):slug:
 
I've read this, and am I missing something? At first I thought it was a before and after thread, now it sounds like you picked up all that hp with just a tune. What the hell am I missing? :confused::dontknow:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Support Us

Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Random Media

waxed srt 015
chaynick
srt10enginebay
photo 5
Back
Top