Ocifer = Dead givewaay for some kind of impairment.
QC AT deeper trans pan
- Thread starter Srt10650
- Start date
The mileage quoted is pencil and paper.
With bigger injectors installed the Overhead Display is now WAY out of whack and displays wildly optimistic fuel economy numbers.
With bigger injectors installed the Overhead Display is now WAY out of whack and displays wildly optimistic fuel economy numbers.
km/liters x 2.82 = Imperial Miles Per Gallon.
But I swear it was the exhaust fumesOcifer = Dead givewaay for some kind of impairment.
Those overheads are mostly worthless and not accurate ... much better to pencil and paper it as you go ... heck mine will read zero for 30 miles
Well 4 to 5 miles per gallon is or would make a decent difference ..as does 300 HP? I’ll take both
The mileage is accurate.
The added 300 horsepower is also accurate.
2/3 of that came from the Strikers (143 wheel was the original increase with the Strikers and camshaft), before the engine rebuild.
The rest from increased compression (true 11:1), (4) different cam profiles tried (not so much for peak HP but EVERYTHING else), properly-sized headers, internal friction reduction (low-friction rings, pins, coated Gen IV Bearings, coated pistons), tune, piston-top design, injector-matching, pulley, and all-'round attention to detail (lots of small things).
The added 300 horsepower is also accurate.
2/3 of that came from the Strikers (143 wheel was the original increase with the Strikers and camshaft), before the engine rebuild.
The rest from increased compression (true 11:1), (4) different cam profiles tried (not so much for peak HP but EVERYTHING else), properly-sized headers, internal friction reduction (low-friction rings, pins, coated Gen IV Bearings, coated pistons), tune, piston-top design, injector-matching, pulley, and all-'round attention to detail (lots of small things).
YES, there is more in it BUT I'm unwilling to delete cats, switch to a peaky hydraulic camshaft (It's A TRUCK!!) or a solid roller (they always can make more power than a hydraulic roller), more compression (would require additives), ported intake, etc. etc.
Support Us
Become A Supporting Member Today!
