maybe a repost but a good read

mopower1958

Full Access Member
Joined
May 20, 2006
Messages
2,482
Reaction score
0
Location
The corner of MOPAR LANE & DODGE AVENUE!
'The other day I was reading Newsweek magazine and came across some poll data I found rather hard to believe. It must be true given the source, right?

The Newsweek poll alleges that 67 percent of Americans are unhappy with the direction the country is headed and 69 percent of the country is unhappy with the performance of the president. In essence 2/3s of the citizenry just ain't happy and want a change.

So being the knuckle dragger I am, I started thinking, ''What we are so unhappy about?''

Is it that we have electricity and running water 24 hours a day, 7 days a week? Is our unhappiness the result of having air conditioning in the summer and heating in the winter? Could it be that 95.4 percent of these unhappy folks have a job? Maybe it is the ability to walk into a grocery store at any time and see more food in moments than Darfur has seen in the last year?

Maybe it is the ability to drive from the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean without having to present identification papers as we move through each state? Or possibly the hundreds of clean and safe motels we would find along the way that can provide temporary shelter? I guess having thousands of restaurants with varying cuisine from around the world is just not good enough. Or could it be that when we wreck our car, emergency workers show up and provide services to help all and even send a helicopter to take you to the hospital.

Perhaps you are one of the 70 percent of Americans who own a home. You may be upset with knowing that in the unfortunate case of a fire, a group of trained firefighters will appear in moments and use top notch equipment to extinguish the flames thus saving you, your family and your belongings. Or if, while at home watching one of your many flat screen TVs, a burglar or prowler intrudes , an officer equipped with a gun and a bullet-proof vest will come to defend you and your family against attack or loss. This all in the backdrop of a neighborhood free of bombs or militias raping and pillaging the residents. Neighborhoods where 90 percent of teenagers own cell phones and computers.

How about the complete religious, social and political freedoms we enjoy that are the envy of everyone in the world? Maybe that is what has 67 percent of you folks unhappy.

Fact is, we are the largest group of ungrateful, spoiled brats the world has ever seen. No wonder the world loves the U.S. , yet has a great disdain for its citizens. They see us for what we are. The most blessed people in the world who do nothing but complain about what we don't have , and what we hate about the country instead of thanking the good Lord we live here.

I know, I know. What about the president who took us into war and has no plan to get us out? The president who has a measly 31 percent approval rating? Is this the same president who guided the nation in the dark days after 9/11? The president that cut taxes to bring an economy out of recession? Could this be the same guy who has been called every name in the book for succeeding in keeping all the spoiled ungrateful brats safe from terrorist attacks?


The commander in chief of an all-volunteer army that is out there defending you and me? Did you hear how bad the President is on the news or talk show? Did this news affect you so much, make you so unhappy you couldn't take a look around for yourself and see all the good things and be glad?

Think about it......are you upset at the President because he actually caused you personal pain OR is it because the 'Media' told you he was failing to kiss your sorry ungrateful behind every day.

Make no mistake about it. The troops in Iraq and Afghanistan have volunteered to serve, and in many cases may have died for your freedom. There is currently no draft in this country. They didn't have to go.

They are able to refuse to go and end up with either a ''general'' discharge, an ''other than honorable'' discharge or, worst case scenario, a ''dishonorable'' discharge after a few days in the brig.

So why then the flat-out discontent ment in the minds of 69 percent of Americans? Say what you want but I blame it on the media. If it bleeds it leads and they specialize in bad news. Everybody will watch a car crash with blood and guts. How many will watch kids selling lemonade at the corner? The media knows this and media outlets are for-profit corporations. They offer what sells , and when criticized, try to defend their actions by 'justifying' them in one way or another. Just ask why they tried to allow a murderer like O.J. Simpson to write a book about how he didn't kill his wife, but if he did he would have done it this way......Insane!

St op buying the negativism you are fed everyday by the media. Shut off the TV, burn Newsweek, and use the New York Times for the bottom of your bird cage. Then start being grateful for all we have as a country. There is exponentially more good than bad.

We are among the most blessed peoples on Earth and should thank God several times a day, or at least be thankful and appreciative.'

'With hurricanes, tornados, fires out of control, mud slides, flooding, severe thunderstorms tearing up the country from one end to another, and with the threat of bird flu and terrorist attacks, 'Are we sure this is a good time to take God out of the Pledge of Allegiance?'

:congrats: :congrats: :congrats: :congrats:
 
Couldnt agree with you more!! We just need to get the national debt under control.Buy gold and silver guys cause the dollar will crash and burn sooner or later!!:rock:
 
If you do not like the concept of "for profit" media filling the wants of the consumer I hope you don't have any investments in them. Maybe you should limit your media consumption to non-profit media...or is there a problem there too? NPR suit your tastes? If not don't blame "for profits", look at society and accept some of the accountability.

By the way "for profit" is the concept of capitalism...or are you in favor of socialism? I think not...buy stock (lots of stock) in the media and then change their approach. You may loose all of your investment but you may change the approach of the news media! Where is your heart? If you don't like the way the media treats the President, sell your house, your truck and everything else so you can buy stock in the media and go to the stock holder meetings and change them...its easy to bitch about them, but are you willing to put your comfort on the line to change them...I bet not.

I could address your other comments but I don't think you really want that. We all love this country...sometimes in different ways.

Let's talk about flag burning...if your want to discuss 1st Amendment issues.
 
Prof said:
If you do not like the concept of "for profit" media filling the wants of the consumer I hope you don't have any investments in them. Maybe you should limit your media consumption to non-profit media...or is there a problem there too? NPR suit your tastes? If not don't blame "for profits", look at society and accept some of the accountability.

By the way "for profit" is the concept of capitalism...or are you in favor of socialism? I think not...buy stock (lots of stock) in the media and then change their approach. You may loose all of your investment but you may change the approach of the news media! Where is your heart? If you don't like the way the media treats the President, sell your house, your truck and everything else so you can buy stock in the media and go to the stock holder meetings and change them...its easy to bitch about them, but are you willing to put your comfort on the line to change them...I bet not.

I could address your other comments but I don't think you really want that. We all love this country...sometimes in different ways.

Let's talk about flag burning...if your want to discuss 1st Amendment issues.


Since you are the all knowing and all seeing soothsayer from the east you ought to know I did not write that. :D :D :D :D I am not going to post who wrote it either because the snopes police will say I am wrong too. So just read it and you and jelms can discuss it:D :D
 
mopower1958 said:
... And I SURE DON'T LISTEN TO LIBERALS!!


Do you prefer conservatives like the Reverend Fred Phelps of Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka? I bet not! At least I hope not.

My only point...if you really think the media is doing wrong, do something about it...the same for all of us...get involved...have an opinion based on your own research and decision making...then try to get things changed to the way you have decided they should be...and if your decision is to not listen to liberals, fine...just be part of the process.

Roy
 
Jake did me a favor and posted it...I just cannot change it yet...it keeps me focused on my students by constantly reminding me that I am a teacher and that is very very important.
 
mopower1958 said:
So just read it and you and jelms can discuss it:D :D

Now let's not drag me into the middle of this one:D I was going to stay out of it, but i would agree with prof:)
 
mopower1958 said:
I would rather listen to guys who are there, like the Marine in Bob's post, than the liberal media. And I SURE DON'T LISTEN TO LIBERALS!!

Yeah...'cause the "conservatives" are such straight shooters, right? Spare me. "Liberals" don't have the market cornered on deception. They >all< lie or twist the truth.
 
Prof said:
Do you prefer conservatives like the Reverend Fred Phelps of Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka? I bet not! At least I hope not.

Roy

I'm afraid (that) I simply must take exception to the Phelps being called conservatives.... They are not conservative in any way, shape or form... They conduct themselves in exactly the same manner as the Aryan Nations, rascist skinheads (Nazis) and the KKK... To (even remotely) place them into the same category as me is (not only) offensive and demeaning...it is absolutely false.

Conservatives are every bit as kind, respectful, humane and altruistic as any (so-called) liberal. Perhaps liberals should exercise as much restraint towards stereotyping all beings as they are towards ethnic or racial minorites....

Love transcends tolerance. And it knows no political or anthropological boundaries.

D
 
Django said:
I'm afraid (that) I simply must take exception to the Phelps being called conservatives.... They are not conservative in any way, shape or form... They conduct themselves in exactly the same manner as the Aryan Nations, rascist skinheads (Nazis) and the KKK... To (even remotely) place them into the same category as me is (not only) offensive and demeaning...it is absolutely false.

Conservatives are every bit as kind, respectful, humane and altruistic as any (so-called) liberal. Perhaps liberals should exercise as much restraint towards stereotyping all beings as they are towards ethnic or racial minorites....

Love transcends tolerance. And it knows no political or anthropological boundaries.

D


They certainly aren't "liberals", however, I'm so glad to see people disavow themselves of any connection to these "Christian" extremists.
 
Normally, I stick to the technical discussions, but I saw the word MEDIA in here and had to comment. Regardless of your direction (Republican, Democrat, Conservative, or Liberal) you have to admit that if there were no media (TV, Radio, News Paper), there would be no terrorism. What would be their incentive? Nobody would ever know what they did, so they would stop their cowardly acts.
 
VA VIPERAM said:
Normally, I stick to the technical discussions, but I saw the word MEDIA in here and had to comment. Regardless of your direction (Republican, Democrat, Conservative, or Liberal) you have to admit that if there were no media (TV, Radio, News Paper), there would be no terrorism. What would be their incentive? Nobody would ever know what they did, so they would stop their cowardly acts.

You are correct, without an avenue to spread their hideous acts, they would not exist. Unfortunately a world without any media is a little unrealistic. Humans as a whole are inquisitive, need to explore, and share their findings with others. What better thing to do this with than the media.

Media is not all evil. At times it can do very good.

-jeff
 
Overclocker said:
Yeah...'cause the "conservatives" are such straight shooters, right? Spare me. "Liberals" don't have the market cornered on deception. They >all< lie or twist the truth.

I completely agree with you O. Every side has it's talking points that the "radio" guys just hammer into their heads. I listen to left and right radio so I can uphold my view that we need a third party for sane people.

-jeff
 
I am the third party!

Roy, the left leaning Republican!

Jessie Ventura called us fiscal conservatives, social liberals.

That's so embarrassing, but accurate.
 
VA VIPERAM said:
Normally, I stick to the technical discussions, but I saw the word MEDIA in here and had to comment. Regardless of your direction (Republican, Democrat, Conservative, or Liberal) you have to admit that if there were no media (TV, Radio, News Paper), there would be no terrorism. What would be their incentive? Nobody would ever know what they did, so they would stop their cowardly acts.

So it's the fault of the news media that we have terrorism in the world? I'm not sure it's that simple. I do think you're right in that they are masters of the public relations game and have effectively used our open media against us for both recruitment and public opinion. However, there are probably other incentives. These guys are religious and ethnic zealots who would most likely engage in this activity regardless. Religious extremism and can justify some truly horrible acts. In my view, which may be totally wrong, the media exposure is a bonus, the absence of which would probably not be a deal-breaker for them.

Whatever the case, I would hate to see this used as a slippery-slope justification to curb any use of 1st Amendment rights. Of anyone.
 
Prof said:
I am the third party!

Roy, the left leaning Republican!

Jessie Ventura called us fiscal conservatives, social liberals.

That's so embarrassing, but accurate.

That sounds like a party I could support. Fiscal conservative, social liberal.

I left the Republicans in protest years ago and I'm now unaffiliated and glad I did it. Barry Goldwater would probably not recognize his own party in its current form.
 
Prof said:
I am the third party!

Roy, the left leaning Republican!

Jessie Ventura called us fiscal conservatives, social liberals.

That's so embarrassing, but accurate.

Sounds good to me:) Jesse "The Body" Ventura is an enigma in the political world. His views are so all over but he was able to win:dontknow:

I would love to believe that more and more of us that are disillusioned by both parties would find a middle ground that kind of defines what we think is important. Both parties have good views and bad ones. Let's take the best form both and go forward:)
 

Latest posts

Support Us

Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Back
Top