Acceleration Defined in Vivid Terms

You guys are looking at this all wrong. The REALquestion is


When are one of the vendors going to offer this engine mod for our trucks

6000hp SRT10 QC...thats the kit I want to have offered to me:D
 
BigRed460 said:
You may want to show your math to wiki...

http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache...R+MILE+WORLD+RECORD?&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us

Read down by the drag racing performance section.

Actually I will stand with what I said.

As I stated, it takes 4.50 seconds to travel 1320 feet at 200mph. In the wikipedia article below they use 4.45 seconds, so what they say is true. If the dragster made a run better than 4.499 seconds he would beat the Corvette. However the National Record is 4.428 seconds. It takes a damn good pass to run a 4.450 lap. And for the record, the National Record for speed is 336.15.

And needless to say, the 3.0 seconds that the original post referred to is pure bullshit.

Anything else I need to check?:dontknow:



The fastest top fuelers can attain terminal speeds of over 530 km/h (330 mph) while covering the quarter mile (402 m) distance in roughly 4.45 seconds. It is often related that Top Fuel dragsters are the fastest accelerating vehicles on Earth; quicker even than the space shuttle launch vehicle or catapult-assisted jet fighter (however this ignores the hydrogen peroxide rocket dragsters such as Sammy Miller and Kitty O'Neil's 3.22 ET and 663 km/h (412 mph) quarter mile world records set in 1977). In fact, a vehicle traveling at a steady 200 mph (322 km/h) as it crosses the starting line will be beaten to the finish line by a top fuel dragster starting from a dead stop at the same moment.
 
One of the very first lessons that my students learn is that Wekipedia is nor a source to ever be quoted. To use it to refute an argument is naive and just plain wrong.

Not that it is worthless, it does give an overview and a quick reference...but it is not a source to be trusted or even quoted.
 
Silverback said:
Actually I will stand with what I said.

As I stated, it takes 4.50 seconds to travel 1320 feet at 200mph. In the wikipedia article below they use 4.45 seconds, so what they say is true. If the dragster made a run better than 4.499 seconds he would beat the Corvette. However the National Record is 4.428 seconds. It takes a damn good pass to run a 4.450 lap. And for the record, the National Record for speed is 336.15.

And needless to say, the 3.0 seconds that the original post referred to is pure bullshit.

Anything else I need to check?:dontknow:



The fastest top fuelers can attain terminal speeds of over 530 km/h (330 mph) while covering the quarter mile (402 m) distance in roughly 4.45 seconds. It is often related that Top Fuel dragsters are the fastest accelerating vehicles on Earth; quicker even than the space shuttle launch vehicle or catapult-assisted jet fighter (however this ignores the hydrogen peroxide rocket dragsters such as Sammy Miller and Kitty O'Neil's 3.22 ET and 663 km/h (412 mph) quarter mile world records set in 1977). In fact, a vehicle traveling at a steady 200 mph (322 km/h) as it crosses the starting line will be beaten to the finish line by a top fuel dragster starting from a dead stop at the same moment.
I didn't mean it like that, wiki is user updated. I literaly ment you should send them your math and have them add it to that article...
 
Prof said:
One of the very first lessons that my students learn is that Wekipedia is nor a source to ever be quoted. To use it to refute an argument is naive and just plain wrong.

Not that it is worthless, it does give an overview and a quick reference...but it is not a source to be trusted or even quoted.
I understand that, thats why I told him to send it in. He should get credit for his proof.
 
BigRed460 said:
I didn't mean it like that, wiki is user updated. I literaly ment you should send them your math and have them add it to that article...

And that my friend is the trouble with the written language. You meant one thing, and Roy and I both took it another way.

No hard feelings on my part.

If fact I enjoy being challenged. After all, we all make mistakes and being challenged makes me go back and double check what I did. Wouldn't be the first time that the dreaded "Beer Goggles" screwed up what I did.:eek: :D
 

Latest posts

Support Us

Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Back
Top