moparracing
Full Access Member
if 2mm's gives ya 5-10 hp, is it possible to remove more ?jrangel said:It is 65mm.
also, seems to make sense on the twin 65's working better with an NA motor due to the intake turbulance thang.........
if 2mm's gives ya 5-10 hp, is it possible to remove more ?jrangel said:It is 65mm.
moparracing said:if 2mm's gives ya 5-10 hp, is it possible to remove more ?
also, seems to make sense on the twin 65's working better with an NA motor due to the intake turbulance thang.........![]()
seems like they could have removed more material, bigger holes.... oh well.:dontknow:jrangel said:http://www.vtcoa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=29161&d=1220651981
The link compares both. The BBK is pretty smooth. The stocker looks like it tapers.
moparracing said:seems like they could have removed more material, bigger holes.... oh well.:dontknow:
it's tempting, but $500.00 for 5hp, hmmmm........
i didn't buy either of those ..........jrangel said:What where the gains with the x-metal and Roe? They both had issues for the guys running the stock intake. This is a twin blade the others are single blade.
Stinker said:do they have a part # for the ram specific one yet?
if so i can check an see what I can do on them
Stinker said:do they have a part # for the ram specific one yet?
if so i can check an see what I can do on them
is this the number for an RC, QC or both ?:dontknow:QuickSilver said::rock: BBK-1776 is correct![]()
Quick
moparracing said:is this the number for an RC, QC or both ?:dontknow:
jrangel said:Just a side note. The 10 runs great with this.