Dems in process of banning guns....

TNVIPER

Active Member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2006
Messages
12,806
Reaction score
5
Location
God's Chosen Land....East TN
As an FFL holder I receive gun law updates regularly from the TN Bureau of Investigation (TBI).....here is a disturbing one I received today..:mad: .(sorry for the indenting..it copied over this way)

Gun Law Update by Alan Korwin,
Author Gun Laws of America Jan. 5, 2008

Gun-ban list proposed

Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory cap), the Democrats
have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush administration when
they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022, 110th Congress).
It serves as a framework for the new list the Brady's plan to introduce
shortly.

I have an outline of the Brady's current plans and targets of opportunity,
It's horrific. They're going after the courts, regulatory agencies, firearms
dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people. They've
made little mention of criminals.

Now more than ever, attention to the entire Bill of Rights is critical. Gun
bans will impact our freedoms under search and seizure, due process,
confiscated property, states' rights, free speech, right to assemble and
more, in addition to the Second Amendment.

The Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final list will be worse):

Rifles (or copies or duplicates):

M1 Carbine, Sturm Ruger Mini-14, AR-15, Bushmaster XM15, Armalite M15,
AR-10, Thompson 1927, Thompson M1; AK, AKM, AKS, AK-47, AK-74, ARM, MAK90,
NHM 90, NHM 91, SA 85, SA 93, VEPR; Olympic Arms PCR; AR70, Calico Liberty,
Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU, Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR,

or FNC, Hi-Point Carbine, HK-91, HK-93, HK-94, HK-PSG-1, Thompson 1927
Commando, Kel-Tec Sub Rifle; Saiga, SAR-8, SAR-4800, SKS with detachable
magazine, SLG 95, SLR
95 or 96, Steyr AU, Tavor, Uzi, Galil and Uzi Sporter, Galil Sporter, or
Galil Sniper Rifle (Galatz).

Pistols (or copies or duplicates):

Calico M-110, MAC-10, MAC-11, or MPA3, Olympic Arms OA, TEC-9, TEC-DC9,
TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10, Uzi.

Shotguns (or copies or duplicates):

Armscor 30 BG, SPAS 12 or LAW 12, Striker 12, Streetsweeper.

Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs):

A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has (i) a
folding or telescoping stock, (ii) a threaded barrel, (iii) a pistol grip
(which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see below), (iv) a
forward grip; or a barrel shroud.

Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10
rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rimfire rifles).

A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine,

and has (i) a second pistol grip, (ii) a threaded barrel, (iii) a barrel
shroud or (iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip,
and (v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more
than 10 rounds.

A semiautomatic shotgun with (i) a folding or telescoping stock, (ii) a
pistol grip (see definition below), (iii) the ability to accept a detachable

magazine or a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds, and (iv) a
shotgun with a revolving cylinder.

Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion kits.

Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will:

Under the proposal, the U.S. Attorney General can add any "semiautomatic
rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or

a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly
suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General." Note

that Obama's pick for this office (Eric Holder, confirmation hearing set for

Jan. 15) wrote a brief in the Heller case supporting the position that you
have no right to have a working firearm in your own home.

In making this determination, the bill says, "there shall be a rebuttable
presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or

any federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting

purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable
for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a
sporting event."

In plain English this means that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal
officers or the military is not suitable for the public.

The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn't have a
sporting purpose just because it can be used for sporting purpose -- is that

devious or what? And of course, "sporting purpose" is a rights infringement
with no constitutional or historical support whatsoever, invented by
domestic enemies of the right to keep and bear arms to further their cause
of disarming the innocent.

Respectfully submitted, Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America
http://www.gunlaws.com/gloa.htm

Foward or send to every gun owner you know....







Douglas D. Woodlee
Manager
Tennessee Instant Check System
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
Nashville, TN
 
But don't worry .Messiah Obama is gonna save us all,not just the US,but the whole world.We will have peace and prosperity on an unprecedented scale.Worldwide peace ,too.So who needs all those dangerous guns ? :p

I expect him to turn water into wine any day now. :p


Seriously though,every gun owner should join the NRA or extend their membership if a member already. They are fighting hard for our 2nd Amendment rights.
 
About time to go to DC and give them your bullets:D They want guns and lead??? Then give them what they want, just Not the way they want to recieve them. Hehehe :rock: :rock:
 
If they want to take away my right to protect my family from rapist murderers then they might as well break into my house and do it themselves! Ignorant bastards!!!!
 
includemeout said:
About time to go to DC and give them your bullets:D They want guns and lead??? Then give them what they want, just Not the way they want to recieve them. Hehehe :rock: :rock:

I have no problems giving mine to them...bullets first! :D
 
HOT RAM said:
But don't worry .Messiah Obama is gonna save us all,not just the US,but the whole world.We will have peace and prosperity on an unprecedented scale.Worldwide peace ,too.So who needs all those dangerous guns ? :p

I expect him to turn water into wine any day now. :p


Seriously though,every gun owner should join the NRA or extend their membership if a member already. They are fighting hard for our 2nd Amendment rights.
Is this where we're heading? Sure seems like it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITPTJzPv4J8&feature=related
 

I think it is time to send these Bastards a message in plain language.

Dear Dumb F@!K Socialist Dem.

The legislation you propose is a direct, blatant, traitorous failure to uphold your oath to defend the constitution, and is nothing more than an obvious attempt to remove the citizens ability to protect themselves against criminals, tyrants, and enemies of the United States, the most dangerous and threatening being YOU! FACTS prove that the only real threat these type firearms present are to criminals themselves and to YOU BASTARDS
as you try to destroy the principles this country was founded upon.

I have proven on several occasions that I am willing to sacrifice everything I have, including my life to defend the Constitution.

Are you sure you want to sacrifice everything you have including YOUR life trying to destroy it?





.
 
supercar1of1 said:

Are you sure you want to sacrifice everything you have including YOUR life trying to destroy it?
The problem is that the people making these new laws are not the ones that will be out enforcing them. While they're home in their mansions, the $30K a year police officer will be the one sent to kick down your door.
 
The Dems should be more focused on banning serial tax cheats from eligibility of being nominated for prominent White House positions..
 
Last edited:
Venom Power said:
The Dems should be more focused on banning serial tax cheats from eligibility of being nominated to hold prominent White House positions..

If they did that, and weeded out the ones that have been involved in illegal activities, they'd just about have to start over with their selections....if we did have the shit these people have done we'd be in prison...what a crock of shit.
 
SilvrSRT10 said:
The problem is that the people making these new laws are not the ones that will be out enforcing them. While they're home in their mansions, the $30K a year police officer will be the one sent to kick down your door.


Who cares, if your over paying the socialist bastard a visit at his mansion at the time.HEHEHE


.
 
What I don't get is Citibank received $45B in tax payers money because they needed a bailout from all the bad loans they approved. Okay so now the gub'ment wants them to offer $36B in loans...?!? HELLO!!! Is anybody...... f*@king.... home???
 

Well the question has been answered why Dem's don't mind raising taxes,

THEY DON"T PAY THEM UNLESS FORCED TO!!!!



.
 
supercar1of1 said:

Well the question has been answered why Dem's don't mind raising taxes,

THEY DON"T PAY THEM UNLESS FORCED TO!!!!



.


NO NO NO, John... They don't PAAAY them unless offered a prominent government position.. Daschle should be tossed in the tank for that BS he tried to pull. His backing out doesn’t impress me. As for that Timothy Geithner dirt bag.. I noticed he’s been veeeery quiet today.. Think he’ll do the honest thing and step down from his official position over the IRS? Let’s watch!
 
Venom Power said:
NO NO NO, John... They don't PAAAY them unless offered a prominent government position.. Daschle should be tossed in the tank for that BS he tried to pull. His backing out doesn’t impress me. As for that Timothy Geithner dirt bag.. I noticed he’s been veeeery quiet today.. Think he’ll do the honest thing and step down from his official position over the IRS? Let’s watch!




Putting Geithner in charge of the IRS is like putting Otis Campbell in charge of

a liquor store.



.
 

Latest posts

Support Us

Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Back
Top