Texas Yellow Fever
Full Access Member
Silverback said:I give up.![]()
HeHeHe...Stinker, we can always reserve the right to say "told you so" when he has to go with a 4:88 or 5:13 to stop his uncontrollable tire spin....
Silverback said:I give up.![]()
Texas Yellow Fever said:HeHeHe...Stinker, we can always reserve the right to say "told you so" when he has to go with a 4:88 or 5:13 to stop his uncontrollable tire spin....![]()
![]()
When was the last time you saw a dragster, pro stock, or any other race car go with a 4:10? Never...and there's a reason for that. They go with a high numerical ratio and dial it in with tires, which works especially well with traditional slicks (like you can run now with the new rear end) because they expand in circumference on the big end thus raising the final drive ratio anyway. But like I said, what do I know...
Silverback said:You hitting the sauce again Steve.:dontknow: You called me Stinker.![]()
Stinker said:Thats the entire subject of this Scrambler, we have our 5 people now to do the group axle buy
Nowwhat is wondering what gear ratio he needs or wants.
I understand what Silver is saying, maybe a 4.88 or so, but mine will see mostly street duty for fun, so I am staying with the 4/56 ratio.
I Nowwhat goes with a 4.56 ro 4.88 he still will be able to change ratio with tire hieght since we can bolt on 15 inch tires with these axles.
But I think Silver what the thread was started for was Nowwhat was wondering what ratio he should actually go for.
I know many variables will take place, but if he had a good start then he can adjust from there.
Stinker said:I give up, I never was arguing, I am going 456 no matter what the detail.
Nowwhat is jsut trying to figure out which ratio ro go with and everybody keeps bouncing around the subject instead of saying he should go with a 4.88 or 4.56 or even a 5.13.
Nowwhat said:actually I was just trying to get you Steve and Silver to start an arguement....![]()
Nowwhat said:actually I was just trying to get you Steve and Silver to start an arguement....![]()
Stinker said:Well in that case...........................Silver dont know his bannanna from a whole in the ground!!
You gotta be outta your mind you know that if you take the radial circumfrence of the tire and the ratio of the rear axle and progress it by 3 times for each gradual 1250ft you will see there is hardly any difference, it is much harder to spin a 2.73 rear axle than it is a 4.88, I cannot belive that a man of bannaism cannot perplex this idea? And we kknow steve is just thinking of boobs ,bigger is better![]()