scoobert
Has Left the Room - Banned from VTCOA!
our radiator is from a cummins... that being said will a cummins intercooler fit right in front of it? if it did, people with turbo setups could use one.... just curious.
intercooler question.
- Thread starter scoobert
- Start date
Dom426
Full Access Member
will not fit right in>>>scoobert said:
scoobert
Has Left the Room - Banned from VTCOA!
that stinks. thou i would immagine that the input and output would line up with holes on the radiator?
the one I jsut used fit perfectlyscoobert said:
Dom426
Full Access Member
an intercooler off acummins, aftermarket was to wide because the frame rails on the cummins are wider.. we had to cut down on the bottom then it bolted right up!Stinker said:
depends on which one you use
scoobert
Has Left the Room - Banned from VTCOA!
now if only i could push 10 psi without the rebuild.....
everyone wants more power Scoobert, but most dont realize the after affects.
getting over 600rwhp on these trucks is costly, fuel system upgrades, which by the way becomes a pain in the ars since msot of the time you cant run under a 1/2 tank without running the pumps dry.
the clutches, rear axles, engine upgrades, guages, tuning, driveablity, cooling.
most should just do simple mods and stay happy and have $$ in there pockets,
fastsrt19 has to me one of the nicest trucks around, and I owuld bet he enjoys it, andhas money in his wallet.
most big builds run 30k or over at a minimum, you dont think it does, and most will argue that statement, but then they havent even done a cat back either.
dom probably has 150k or twice that in his
fstjack has probably 200k in ONE of his
ram from hell at leat 100k
others at least 50k to get to 750hp
its not cheap, they dont last, and comming from a vendor this may sound stupid, but building one for big hp is dumb unless you got the money to do it twice
getting over 600rwhp on these trucks is costly, fuel system upgrades, which by the way becomes a pain in the ars since msot of the time you cant run under a 1/2 tank without running the pumps dry.
the clutches, rear axles, engine upgrades, guages, tuning, driveablity, cooling.
most should just do simple mods and stay happy and have $$ in there pockets,
fastsrt19 has to me one of the nicest trucks around, and I owuld bet he enjoys it, andhas money in his wallet.
most big builds run 30k or over at a minimum, you dont think it does, and most will argue that statement, but then they havent even done a cat back either.
dom probably has 150k or twice that in his
fstjack has probably 200k in ONE of his
ram from hell at leat 100k
others at least 50k to get to 750hp
its not cheap, they dont last, and comming from a vendor this may sound stupid, but building one for big hp is dumb unless you got the money to do it twice
good advice,ive put about 1,000$ into mine (sct tune,air flow)and im gonna be happy with that.I would love more power,but i made that mistake with a previous truck.it was a 2002 diesel ,first it started out with small upgrades and before i knew it i probably had 30k in upgrades and then it was just a matter of time before stuff started breaking=$$$$$$$$$ just my opinionStinker said:
HOT RAM
Full Access Member
Stinker said:
One of the best (and brutally honest) posts I have seen in awhile
:congrats: :congrats: :congrats: :congrats: :congrats: :congrats:
:rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock: :rock:
How many years did we dream of 400 HP engines,then we get 500 HP stock and still aren't happy :dontknow:
scoobert
Has Left the Room - Banned from VTCOA!
i agree very good. never thought that 150K should be put in one engine. personally i would start with something faster for 150K. i can think of 5 cars stock faster then a built truck.
but maybe in the 1920's things were slower.
i was born in 82, 300hp wasn't hard to come by then, by the 90's 500 was easy to buy. by 96 you could get 700hp stock. and now.... 1015hp from the factory CCXR.
but maybe in the 1920's things were slower.
HOT RAM
Full Access Member
scoobert said:
hahahahaha born in 65
I haven't seen a 700 HP stock truck yet ,much less in 96 :dontknow:
scoobert
Has Left the Room - Banned from VTCOA!
car
not truck
not truck
Dom426
Full Access Member
you are right i will more than likely tear my engine down every year and go through it..........goin fast is simple math fast = money squaredStinker said:
That is painfully correct.
bigike
Full Access Member
82..... It was hard to get 150 hp in those days.
ANd it is no different if you do the work yourself, and are lazy on top of it :marchmellow: that is why I am happy where I will be. FYI A AERO 1000 works very good as a booster pump
scoobert
Has Left the Room - Banned from VTCOA!
The engine was designed from the start to be a "quad cam" - 2xDOHC (two cams per cylinder-bank) 60° V12 - as an intentional snub by Mr. Lamborghini of Ferrari's single-cam per-bank design. When the 3464 cc prototype was tested in 1963, it was able to produce 370 bhp (276 kW; 375 PS) at 9000 rpm - a figure of almost 107 bhp (80 kW; 108 PS) per litre, and unprecedented at the time.
scoobert
Has Left the Room - Banned from VTCOA!
The Diablo was presented to the public for sale on January 21, 1990 at a base price of USD $240,000 at the Hotel de Paris in Monte Carlo during the second Lamborghini Day.[2] Power came from a 5.7-litre, 48-valve version of the legendary Lamborghini V12 featuring dual overhead cams and computer-controlled multi-point fuel injection, producing a maximum output of 492 hp (367 kW; 499 PS) and 427 ft·lbf (579 N·m) of torque.
bigike
Full Access Member
LOL yeah those are normal cars.
Support Us
Become A Supporting Member Today!
