Lunar Eclipse Tonight

Prof

New Member
Supporting Member
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
23,178
Reaction score
0
Location
Wadsworth, IL
Anyone else watching? Just starting here in the Chicago area.
 
Prof said:
Anyone else watching? Just starting here in the Chicago area.
Lemme go look :dontknow: :dontknow: :D
 
Woooo Hoooo! We got one too :D :D :D
 
That's what that was? Man, I just thought the gods were angry again! That's the third wasted ritual sacrifice this year!:p

I don't have a 35mm adapter and the photo tracking software for my 'scope, so I just shot these with the digital and 100x telephoto. The more illuminated area in the southern polar region is somewhat exaggerated (compared to what you see with the naked eye) due to the length of the exposure, but there is a brightness difference from pole to pole at this latitude.
 

Attachments

  • 75% Eclipse.JPG
    75% Eclipse.JPG
    46.6 KB · Views: 30
  • 90% Eclipse.JPG
    90% Eclipse.JPG
    19.6 KB · Views: 33
  • 100% Eclipse.JPG
    100% Eclipse.JPG
    61 KB · Views: 31
Last edited:
Ram From Hell said:
That's what that was? Man, I just thought the gods were angry again! That's the third wasted ritual sacrifice this year!:p

I don't have a 35mm adapter and the photo tracking software for my 'scope, so I just shot these with the digital and 100x telephoto. The more illuminated area in the southern polar region is somewhat exaggerated (compared to what you see with the naked eye) due to the length of the exposure, but there is a brightness difference from pole to pole at this latitude.
Use a tripod ;) :D :p
 
Ram From Hell said:
That's what that was? Man, I just thought the gods were angry again! That's the third wasted ritual sacrifice this year!:p

I don't have a 35mm adapter and the photo tracking software for my 'scope, so I just shot these with the digital and 100x telephoto. The more illuminated area in the southern polar region is somewhat exaggerated (compared to what you see with the naked eye) due to the length of the exposure, but there is a brightness difference from pole to pole at this latitude.
Well yea they were pretty angry.. Mars was closest to the earth.....
 
TheSickness said:
Use a tripod ;) :D :p

Dude, I am a tripod!:D

Mike, I was using a tripod. The image is blurred from the earth's rotation during the time that the camera aperture is open (that's right, the earth goes around like the wheels on your short bus :p ). The only way to compensate for that is to have the camera attached to the telescope with a motorized base, driven by software that moves the scope to track the object being photographed. As I said above, I just don't have the camera adapter and software to drive the base on my scope.
 
Ram From Hell said:
Dude, I am a tripod!:D

Mike, I was using a tripod. The image is blurred from the earth's rotation during the time that the camera aperture is open (that's right, the earth goes around like the wheels on your short bus :p ). The only way to compensate for that is to have the camera attached to the telescope with a motorized base, driven by software that moves the scope to track the object being photographed. As I said above, I just don't have the camera adapter and software to drive the base on my scope.
I know Bro..I was poking fun at my own inability to take a simple pic of the moon :eek: I have tried the tripod and numerous other things to no avail...Still learning the digital camera :eek: If I had a regular SLR I would be ok...But I am a blithering Dip shit with electronics......LOOOLOLOOL You know that I worked for you once Hahahahahha :D :eek: :D
 
Had nothing else to do so I made my own tipod.:D I got a long bolt and screwed it to the bottom of our little cheap 4 megapixel camara and taped the bolt to the hand rail. I took the flash off and reduced the exposure as much as i could. Then i put it on the timer that way it wouldnt move.....Here are some pics i took at work.....
 

Attachments

  • DSCN0375.JPG
    DSCN0375.JPG
    451.8 KB · Views: 11
  • DSCN0382.JPG
    DSCN0382.JPG
    238.3 KB · Views: 9
  • DSCN0394.JPG
    DSCN0394.JPG
    292 KB · Views: 12
  • DSCN0402.JPG
    DSCN0402.JPG
    324.9 KB · Views: 10
  • DSCN0404.JPG
    DSCN0404.JPG
    326.6 KB · Views: 9
  • DSCN0406.JPG
    DSCN0406.JPG
    313.2 KB · Views: 9
  • DSCN0413.JPG
    DSCN0413.JPG
    317 KB · Views: 10
  • DSCN0414.JPG
    DSCN0414.JPG
    315.9 KB · Views: 12
  • DSCN0431.JPG
    DSCN0431.JPG
    302.6 KB · Views: 13
  • DSCN0451.JPG
    DSCN0451.JPG
    778.9 KB · Views: 15
Ram From Hell said:
Dude, I am a tripod!:D

Classic come back.

I would use it but, well you have to have a little credibility in that area to make it work...and we Asians were not blessed in that area.
 
Prof said:
Classic come back.

I would use it but, well you have to have a little credibility in that area to make it work...and we Asians were not blessed in that area.
:D .............:D
 

Attachments

  • apr11gal39.jpg
    apr11gal39.jpg
    44.3 KB · Views: 22
SRT-IZ said:
Had nothing else to do so I made my own tipod.:D I got a long bolt and screwed it to the bottom of our little cheap 4 megapixel camara and taped the bolt to the hand rail. I took the flash off and reduced the exposure as much as i could. Then i put it on the timer that way it wouldnt move.....Here are some pics i took at work.....

Cool. Nice results, given the setup! Doesn't hurt being in AZ either, being at a lower latitude and having less light scatter/pollution to reduce contrast.
 
Ram From Hell said:
Cool. Nice results, given the setup! Doesn't hurt being in AZ either, being at a lower latitude and having less light scatter/pollution to reduce contrast.
We are the Mecca of less light scatter :D There ain't Dick between me and Shawn's house 127 mikes away................:D
 

Latest posts

Support Us

Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Back
Top