Maryland Gun Laws

JeffBoyette

Full Access Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2008
Messages
2,644
Reaction score
0
Location
Waldorf, MD
I live near DC. Hear and read about crime in local area every day. Economy going to **** and the world in turmoil, Im looking at building a weapon arsenal. Im military and currently live in Maryland. Im moving in 8 months and will move to VA if the gun laws are more permitting. Anyone one have any info?
 
pm'd.... thanks for the lead. ive researched these laws and they are so vague and open to interpretation. Everything seems like a gray area.
 
I do know that VA guns laws are better than marylands.
 
You got that right! I love the fact you can buy a silencer in VA. I used to roll around with a DE.50AE in the center console but switched to a FNH 5.7 X 28. Now I don't rock anything, Colorado is pretty calm compaired to DC.

I do know that VA guns laws are better than marylands.
 
In maryland you can own a gun, but cant transport it unless buying, target practice, hunting or going to gunsmith. You cannot get a concealed carry permit unless you prove "GOOD REASON"

Evidently my Top Secret security clearance and job working with Air Force One, isnt reason enough to try to protect myself and wife off duty from people that would want information.

But we have light at the end of the tunnel. Changes may be coming.

Maryland's 'good reason' gun law found unconstitutional | Washington Examiner

Mon, 2012-03-05 14:23 BALTIMORE -- Maryland's requirement that residents show a "good and substantial reason" to get a handgun permit is unconstitutional, according to a federal judge's opinion filed Monday.

States can channel the way their residents exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms, but because Maryland's goal was to minimize the number of firearms carried outside homes by limiting the privilege to those who could demonstrate "good reason," it had turned into a rationing system, infringing upon residents' rights, U.S. District Judge Benson Everett Legg wrote.

"A citizen may not be required to offer a `good and substantial reason' why he should be permitted to exercise his rights," he wrote. "The right's existence is all the reason he needs."

Plaintiff Raymond Woollard obtained a handgun permit after fighting with an intruder in his Hampstead home in 2002, but was denied a renewal in 2009 because he could not show he had been subject to "threats occurring beyond his residence." Woollard appealed, but was rejected by the review board, which found he hadn't demonstrated a "good and substantial reason" to carry a handgun as a reasonable precaution. The suit filed in 2010 claimed that Maryland didn't have a reason to deny the renewal and wrongly put the burden on Woollard to show why he still needed to carry a gun.

"People have the right to carry a gun for self-defense and don't have to prove that there's a special reason for them to seek the permit," said his attorney Alan Gura, who has challenged handgun bans in the District of Columbia and Chicago. "We're not against the idea of a permit process, but the licensing system has to acknowledge that there's a right to bear arms."

The lawsuit, which names the state police superintendent and members of the Handgun Permit Review Board, was also filed on behalf of the Bellevue, Wash.-based Second Amendment Foundation. Maryland's Attorney General's office was still reviewing the opinion and declined to comment immediately.

Many states require gun permits, but Illinois has a ban and six states, including Maryland, issue permits on a discretionary basis, Gura said. In most of those states, these challenges have not succeeded in U.S. District Courts, but they are being appealed, he said.

"Most states that choose to regulate the right to bear arms have licensing systems that are objective and straightforward," Gura said. "That's all that we want for Maryland."
 
"A citizen may not be required to offer a `good and substantial reason' why he should be permitted to exercise his rights," "The right's existence is all the reason he needs."
 
hopefully bro, the law gets changed. I know they are looking into it again.

I agree, why can't I carry a mack 10 in my truck at all times ? HAHA or tec 9.
 
see this is why I don't see the united states for being a free country at all. it's in the Second Amendment saying right to have arms. but our goverment will not allow people to do so.

what a joke. the reason honest people NEED a gun to carry. is for protection. it's simple.

crazy ass people out there. I hope they change this.
 

Latest posts

Support Us

Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Back
Top