HaulinAsp said:OOooooooof ! I'm in LOVE:dancing: Need info on this mofo- STAT!!!!![]()
HaulinAsp said:Ok screw the paper towels- I need I nice soft terry cloth towel.......![]()
![]()
![]()
Silverback said:Put a sock on it.![]()
![]()
![]()
Silverback said:Put a sock on it.![]()
![]()
![]()
Black1 said:Yeah, but use a clean one.... You don't want athlete's foot.![]()
![]()
Oh No! Itchy Dick, Itchy Dick!Silverback said:That would be Athlete's Johnson, son.![]()
![]()
Silverback said:To get back to the question at hand, regarding the effectiveness of the manifold, I would have to question the turbulance of the air inside the plenum chamber. You have the throttle ports and velocity stacks sticking up inside this area. We have issues with our current design and it's not cluttered up.
It does however sure look nice.![]()
Silverback said:To get back to the question at hand, regarding the effectiveness of the manifold, I would have to question the turbulance of the air inside the plenum chamber. You have the throttle ports and velocity stacks sticking up inside this area. We have issues with our current design and it's not cluttered up.
It does however sure look nice.![]()
Begood said:Oh No! Itchy Dick, Itchy Dick!
Bill.
Black1 said:Actually, John.... The intake looks very similar to the intakes on F1 cars. Also, the intake on my 2002 M5 looked VERY similar to that (raised velocity stacks, individual throttle bodies, all encased in a box). :dontknow: I thought "turbulance" in the intake air-charge was a good thing?![]()
Black1 said:Actually, John.... The intake looks very similar to the intakes on F1 cars. Also, the intake on my 2002 M5 looked VERY similar to that (raised velocity stacks, individual throttle bodies, all encased in a box). :dontknow: I thought "turbulance" in the intake air-charge was a good thing?![]()
Silverback said:As long as all cylinders are receiving the same, or close to the same amount of air, all is good. If not, then you will have issues with rich/lean cylinders.