Right to Bear Arms Poll...

Texas Yellow Fever

Full Access Member
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
8,086
Reaction score
0
Location
Fayetteville, Ark.
I don't know if this is legit or not, but I voted...

Please vote on this gun issue question with USA Today. It will only take a few seconds of your time. Then pass the link on to all the pro gun
folks you know. Hopefully these results will be published later this month. This upcoming year will become critical for gun owners with the
Supreme Court accepting the District of Columbia case against the right for individuals to keep and bear arms.



First - vote on this one.Second - launch it to other folks and have THEM vote - then we will see if the results get published.Vote in the USA Today poll - click on the link below.



The Question is:



Does the Second Amendment give individuals the right to bear arms?



Vote here:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/quickquestion/2007/november/popup5895.htm
 
Done, but maybe the question should have been:

What should be done to politicians that attempt to alter the "Right to Bear Arms??
1) Immediate Impeachment based on Not keeping their Oath to uphold the Constitution

2) Charged with Conspiracy to Violate the Civil Liberties of the US citizens

3) Hung for Treason
 
Wifey said:
Done, but maybe the question should have been:

What should be done to politicians that attempt to alter the "Right to Bear Arms??
1) Immediate Impeachment based on Not keeping their Oath to uphold the Constitution

2) Charged with Conspiracy to Violate the Civil Liberties of the US citizens

3) Hung for Treason
4) All of the Above.
724_noose_hanging.gif
2a.gif
 
Last edited:
HOT RAM's 2nd Amendment lesson

It is so simple

ALL other rights are to the individual,why is this one being questioned by the gun-grabbers ?

"...the RIGHT of THE PEOPLE to KEEP and BEAR arms,SHALL NOT be infringed..."

How can anyone mis-understand that ?

"A well regulated militia..." The militia was made up of citizens (this was not in reference to an ARMY)

That word "regulated" is where most of the confusion comes in

In modern usage it means " restricted", in it's archaic usage ( as used by the writers of our Bill of Rights) it meant "equipped"


So ,in modern language it would read "A well-equipped militia being necessary ..."

Most of those in the political world are highly educated and some were even lawyers,so they are not ignorant of the meaning and intent of the 2nd Amendment,but rather they are puposely obfuscating it's true meaning
 
Last edited:
Voted!! Apparently we all agree!! The problem is the government does not care how we the people feel. Whether it's you current president or gun control they enact laws based on how they feel it should be run. :(
 
Voted. I guess I am part of the 96% now.

Gun control = Holding the gun with both hands, lol.
 

I voted NO! With the economy the way it is, it is better that only the police and military have firearms.

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*Just kidding!!!:p :p :p :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


.
 
I just pray ta' God that this forums members were not as far off in our voting on this issue as we were on the election for President.....

D
 
Django said:
I just pray ta' God that this forums members were not as far off in our voting on this issue as we were on the election for President.....

D


pray Tim

prey HARD!!!
 
faslane505 said:
pray Tim

prey HARD!!!

I was prepared to give Obama some time to make some good decisions before I came down on him........

Time's up.............

D
 
Django said:
I was prepared to give Obama some time to make some good decisions before I came down on him........

Time's up.............

D


Believe it or not I was sincerely hoping for everyones sake that things would not be bad. I never dreamed that they would be as bad as they are. It seems obvious now that the words demagogue and spin are the defining words that apply to this administration.:(


.
 
The whole point of the right to bear arms was for the people to defend themselves from a tyrannical gov't. If the gov't wants to take your arms now, what does that tell you?

I voted, but I think the poll will go nowhere. Most news/reporting agencies are so bass-akwards that they will only report the anti-gun stories. Had the poll been 96% against the 2nd Amendment, there probably would be a huge story written on it. I bet it disappears into the archives...
 

Would be nice if one of our guys that are talented with computers could figure out how to send the poll to fox news and the conservative radio folks before it disappears.


.
 
wtf, why would anyone have voted against this, it is our right to bear arms, fought for with blood and tear!!!!!!!!!!!!!ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR:mad:
 

Latest posts

Support Us

Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Back
Top