Well, what do you think?
Should OJ get life in prison?
- Thread starter Silverback
- Start date
Alberta-SRT
Full Access Member
I think Life is too good for him, Why should he have Govt care into his last days? When he is an old invalid in diapers with no quality of life left, cut off payment of his meds and send him out the door to fend for himself.
ohiosrt10
Full Access Member
Life seems harsh.. how about 30 years??
/That should do it...
/That should do it...
I voted to give him a life sentence but only cuz he skated the double murder charges....
It doesn't work under the laws of sentencing of course, but still ...... P.O.S.
D
It doesn't work under the laws of sentencing of course, but still ...... P.O.S.
D
Django said:
Great answer. I feel the same.
EMT/SRT said:
"The crime and the sentence may not fit, but that's cuz we don't give a shit.."
D
andrew heywood
Full Access Member
oj
Whatever it is, he is not a happy camper.
Whatever it is, he is not a happy camper.
black pearl
Full Access Member
throw away the key
ViperJeff said:
It is apparent that OJ considers himself above the standards of normal human beings.....
He thinks he's in a higher class altogether..... That his wealth and notoriety make him immune to the standards of decency.....
Elitist prick deserves whatever he gets....
D
QuickSilver
Full Access Member
:rock: The Judge he is facing in L.V. is known as the "Hanging-Judge"!
Pretty tough cookie, on the bad-guy's.......:congrats:
He's toast!,
Quick
Pretty tough cookie, on the bad-guy's.......:congrats:
He's toast!,
Quick
Well yes he should have been in prison a long time ago.
Django said:
Well that covers 99% of politicians and at least 90% of the Hollywood types.
- Joined
- May 18, 2006
- Messages
- 35,137
- Reaction score
- 13,105
Django said:
How would you have voted if you didn't think he was guilty of the double murders? :dontknow: He isn't being tried for that anymore but apparently he is still being judged for it.
That doesn't seem just or fair to me. I'm not saying he did or didn't commit the double murders, but this is a separate trial and shouldn't the verdict be for the current charges and not the old ones?
I'm glad you're not the Jury
........ but of course most of them probably think the same way 
supercar1of1
Full Access Member
LIFE*
I am equally torn between my personal feelings toward that monster and the
principle of blind justice.
*Were it not for him being found responsible for the deaths of two innocent people by a court of competent jurisdiction, I would have had to vote that only the charges before the court at this time should be considered.
.
- Joined
- May 18, 2006
- Messages
- 35,137
- Reaction score
- 13,105
supercar1of1 said:
Do you mean because he was acquitted rather than found Not Guilty? :dontknow:
supercar1of1
Full Access Member
Wifey said:How would you have voted if you didn't think he was guilty of the double murders? :dontknow: He isn't being tried for that anymore but apparently he is still being judged for it.
That doesn't seem just or fair to me. I'm not saying he did or didn't commit the double murders, but this is a separate trial and shouldn't the verdict be for the current charges and not the old ones?
I'm glad you're not the Jury
The later civil ct did find him, and him alone, responsible.
Otherwise, I am begrudgingly with you.
.
OCBob
VIPER POWERED
I've got a question that I really don't know the answer to, figured maybe somebody here did before I went looking.
Were the guys that stole the shit in the first place ever prosecuted? I don't ever remember hearing that they were, though I might have missed it or just plain forgotten.
Were the guys that stole the shit in the first place ever prosecuted? I don't ever remember hearing that they were, though I might have missed it or just plain forgotten.
Support Us
Become A Supporting Member Today!
