Scrambler1 said:
Best of luck Mark, let us know how you turn out.
On the issue of govt healthcare... what about surgery for things that are not life threatening but impact lifestyle? For instance I have a knee that I tore up years ago. I have so far avoided having surgery on it because it hasn't greatly impacted my lifestyle. I'm avoiding surgery as long as possible because, from what I've seen, once you have surgery on a joint you will continue to for the rest of your life. Is the government going to pay for that? How long will I have to wait? Issues such as this are one of my big problems with govt run healthcare. I don't want the government to be able to decide what surgery I do or don't get.
Roy you mentioned that we are the only top tier country that doesn't have socialized medicine... is it a coincidence that we have much better healthcare available than all of those countries? For example you saying there were more mobile cat scan machines in Jax than in all of Canada. Why does the quality always go down after the govt takes it over?
Its a question that has been studied deeply. There are all of the normal responses...governments don't do anything very well...governments are not good at early adoption of new technology, government does not motivate people to outstanding performance...all of which are true.
The critical issue is not socialized health care. It is access to primary care.
It needs to be said that there are levels of quality in health care...and there are philosophical differences about what quality level is correct at what point in time...business decision makers face this issue on a daily basis...we business owners would like to respond to every question immediately...but there is a point at which that will sink the business isn't there??
That is the quandary...if a population uses three cat scans ten percent of the time, and 90% of the time they sit idle, but the associated costs are still additive to the cost of care in the community, is that justifiable?
So what ends up happening is that our capitalistic philosophy of allowing competition continues to drive the cost of care to the point where the system is incapable of supporting itself.
If a society provides access to primary care for all (the concept that health care is a right not a privilege), it will drastically reduce the acuity level of health care treatment which demands less technology, is less intensive, and consequently much less expensive. We need to adjust our approach, put our resources on the front end...in avoiding disease with life style changes, emphasize early diagnosis and treatment prior to chronic onset of sever illness and realize that the dying process is part of a normal progression for the human being.
I'm not in favor of socialized medicine, I am a capitalist. But I also think that primary care is a right not something just for those that can afford it. And in those two philosophies, I truly believe that there is a solution to our health care crisis. Hillary had it right, Obama has it part right, McCain was clueless.
Reference your knee...an orthopedic surgeon would say that you are being foolish in not getting it repaired. You are probably compromising your hip while you delay the repair...(or possibly creating disc problems, that will really be a problem) if in the future you need a hip replacement, you might well be able to trace the problem to neglecting your knee. Get it fixed...