Good morning to all...or ....well....whatever time it is where you are......
Contrary to my usual writing style, I'd like to speak bluntly.
First off I do congratulate Mikey for his conduct and diplomacy in recent days... Mikey you rule bro.
Here's the blunt part: Why the hell are we speaking about a "you know who"...? First off, I can pretty much assume who that is. But I believe it's kinda gutless (sorry) not to come out and name that person.
One might say, "everyone except that feckless idiot Django knows who it is anyway....so effin' what?"...
Here's so what:
If this forum, as a group, has issues with a specific person that are left unresolved and unspoken, how does that benefit this family.....?
I believe it is far better to bring things out into the open and confront an individual directly, either with our issues or opinions neccesary rather than beating around the bush with inuendos and duplicitous anonymity.
True, I'm being a pain in the ass about this.... and that clearly by intent. But as someone once said, "At least you know where you stand with a Sicilian, he will put it right in your face."
There's a time and place to be diplomatic and euphemistic. But this isn't it. The parties involved should speak the unvarnished truth like MEN. If someone is persona non grata, then name him and tell him so......
And if that means asking someone to leave, as I did to Roktman, then so be it.
Anything else is candy assed.
I welcome your opinions.
SD
:dontknow: 
