What do you think of this?

OCBob

VIPER POWERED
Joined
May 19, 2006
Messages
10,488
Reaction score
15
Location
splitting lanes at a buck ten
I like to get different perspectives on things, just to see what other people are thinking. And this seems like a good one to throw out there. So what are your thoughts on this? I'll reserve my comments til later, just so I don't poison the pot, so to speak.
********************************************************

HELENA-WEST HELENA, Ark. — Officers armed with military rifles have been stopping and questioning passers-by in a neighborhood plagued by violence that's been under a 24-hour curfew for a week.

On Tuesday, the Helena-West Helena City Council voted 9-0 to allow police to expand that program into any area of the city, despite a warning from a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas that the police stops were unconstitutional.

Police Chief Fred Fielder said the patrols have netted 32 arrests since they began last week in a 10-block neighborhood in this small town on the banks of the Mississippi River long troubled by poverty. The council said those living in the city want the random shootings and drug-fueled violence to stop, no matter what the cost.

"Now if somebody wants to sue us, they have an option to sue, but I'm fairly certain that a judge will see it the way the way the citizens see it here," Mayor James Valley said. "The citizens deserve peace, that some infringement on constitutional rights is OK and we have not violated anything as far as the Constitution."

The area under curfew, in what used to be a West Helena neighborhood, sits among abandoned homes and occupied residences in disrepair.

White signs on large blue barrels warn those passing by that the area remains under curfew by order of Mayor James Valley. The order was scheduled to end at 3 p.m. Tuesday, but Valley said the city council's vote would allow police to have the same powers across Helena-West Helena.

Among the curfew operation's arrests, 10 came from felony charges, including the arrest of two people carrying both drugs and weapons, Fielder said. The police chief said the officers in the field carry military-style M-16 or M-4 rifles, some equipped with laser sights. Other officers carry short-barrel shotguns. Many dealing crack cocaine and marijuana in the city carry pistols and AK-47 assault rifles, he said.

"We've had people call us, expressing concern for their children," Fielder said. "They had to sleep on the floor, because of stray bullets."

Fielder said officers had not arrested anyone for violating the curfew, only questioned people about why they were outside. Those without good answers or acting nervously get additional attention, Fielder said.

However, such stops likely violate residents' constitutional rights to freely assemble and protections against unreasonable police searches, said Holly Dickson, a lawyer for the ACLU of Arkansas who addressed the council at its packed Tuesday meeting. Because of that, Dickson said any convictions coming from the arrests likely would be overturned.

"The residents of these high-crime areas are already victims," she said. "They're victims of what are happening in the neighborhoods, they're victims of fear. But for them to be subject to unlawful stops and questioning ... that is not going to ultimately going to help this situation."

The council rejected Dickson's claims, at one point questioning the Little Rock-based attorney if she'd live in a neighborhood they described as under siege by wild gunfire and gangs.

"As far as I'm concerned, at 3 o'clock in the morning, nobody has any business being on the street, except the law," Councilman Eugene "Red" Johnson said. "Anyone out at 3 o'clock shouldn't be out on the street, unless you're going to the hospital."

The curfew is the second under the mayor's watch since the rival cities of Helena and West Helena merged in 2006. That year, Valley set a nightly citywide curfew after a rash of burglaries and other thefts.

Police in Hartford, Conn., began enforcing a nightly curfew for youths after recent violence, including a weekend shooting that killed a man and wounded six young people.

Helena-West Helena, with 15,000 residents at the edge of Arkansas' eastern rice fields and farmland, is in one of the nation's poorest regions, trailing even parts of Appalachia in its standard of living.

In the curfew area, those inside the homes in the watch area peered out of door cracks Tuesday as police cruisers passed. They closed the doors afterward.
 
Sounds like the Police are taking back their town.

It no different then what were doing in Iraq to rid on of the insurgents in an area. Why re invent the wheel.

Insurgents - gang members , samething in my world.
Let God sort them out.
 
Yep...

Domestic Terrorism is the worst

Glad to see someone (the town and its citizens) are trying to make a difference
 
I'm not sure how I feel about this yet. I agree that at least they are trying to do something. However, this part bothers me: "The citizens deserve peace, that some infringement on constitutional rights is OK and we have not violated anything as far as the Constitution."

How can you infringe on someone's constitutional rights, but not violate anything as far as the constitution? That is contradictory.

"Those that would trade a little freedom for security will soon have neither"
-Benjamin Franklin
 
It not Marshall Law, but close.

I get up at 3 am to go to Military training, and it bugs the crap out of me seeing people hanging out or walking around the neighborhood that you know don't live there. Lost a check book a few weeks ago due to someone getting into my car. Didn't lose any money that they wrote from the checks, but it did cost me money stopping payments on those checks, and time away from work going to the bank (twice so far) to do paper work on the checks returned.

I still give it thumbs up.
 
Here's My Take

It is sad that the liberties of the innocent and fear stricken residents have to be compromised at any level for piece of mind. For this reason this subject has two sides to it. I've always been an advocate for inalienable rights for all people of this planet. But with the term ‘inalienable’ therein lies the very contradiction that outlines this whole dilemma.

Inalienable (Individual) Rights are: natural rights, among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. They are the most fundamental set of human rights, natural means not-granted nor conditional. They are applicable only to humans, as the basic necessity of their survival. The United States Constitution contains these very same choice words which forms the backbone of our freedoms for over two centuries. If we were to agree that these two cities, Helena and West Helena, should not be subjected to extra policing and restrictions, like curfews, then those who are victims to the abundant illegal activities there have been failed by their government, which was set in place to provide them protection. For these victims there is no liberties, no pursuit of happiness and for those that have been fatally injured or murdered, no right for life. However, the criminals get to enjoy these rights. Yes they usually end up killed in the process but that is what they have chosen. The innocent victims didn’t choose these circumstances that plague them, such as fear, imminent danger, impending death, lack of safety and lack of hope.

On the flip side if we chose an endeavor to restore these inalienable rights to the people by stripping them of some, it would give them hope. I mean, if I were a law abiding citizen I wouldn’t give a second thought about a police officer asking me questions. I don’t have to wonder, “Am I okay with this..?” NO, I understand the situation and I know I am not part of the problem. By simply answering his/her questions I am in fact actively taking part in the solution. Yes my Constitutional rights may be infringed upon but so what? I’d rather have my rights infringed upon and live than to get killed in a gang cross-fire or to have a stray bullet enter my daughter’s window to claim her life. And in the middle of the night I’d be in bed anyway (probably awake waiting for what or who may come through my window). If I had to be out and about at that hour I'm sure I’d have a good reason. I’m confident and not a gang-banger, so let’s have those questions please.

Many would say, “Well just move then.” But for many of those folks they can’t move. It isn’t easy. They are living in poverty for Pete’s sake, it happens. Who’s going to complain about infringement of rights other than the thugs and some azzhole lawyers like Holly Dickson who probably doesn’t know how it is to live under such harsh and scary circumstances. I say to continue the efforts there in trying to bring peace to these peoples’ lives. It’s what I would want if I were a resident there. How does the old saying go?? “Desperate times call for desperate measures.”
 
Last edited:
Damn your making me read entirely too much!!!!!!!
 
"Those that would trade a little freedom for security will soon have neither"
-Benjamin Franklin[/QUOTE]


IMO this says it all. You can't have it both ways. The constitution can not be bent to one's liking whenever it seems necessary. If we break the law to enforce the law, there will be total lawlessness.
 
ChrisAZ said:
"Those that would trade a little freedom for security will soon have neither"
-Benjamin Franklin


IMO this says it all. You can't have it both ways. The constitution can not be bent to one's liking whenever it seems necessary. If we break the law to enforce the law, there will be total lawlessness.[/QUOTE]




I thought Franklins quote was, Those that would trade a little freedom for security "DESERVE" neither. ?








.
 
Maybe if the federal minimum wage was more than $6.55 per hour they wouldn't have to live in such poverty to begin with?
 
It's like mini Marshall law..... Many civil liberties are suspended...

For me, if the greater good is served, then so be it....

I think (Bobby) that you are in opposition to that opinion.... But there is such a thing as bad guys who intentionally hide behind the "sacred curtain of civil liberty" for the purpose of doing evil deeds like killing innocent people... That's just wrong....

I often quote Benjamin Netanyehu's statement that our precious freedoms are killing us..... I thoroughly comprehend what a slippery slope this issue can be....and I also ask the question, "to what degree is this permissable..." Are we opening the door to totalitarianism...? I doubt it....

The bad guys are slick and smart... And the fkn ACLU should be indicted on RICO statutes...... Let's just stop fkn around and just get the bad guys... This is just like the manner in which Congress has denied us Victory in Viet Nam and Iraq........ The ACLU and all their ilk just don't wanna win...PERIOD.

I say "fck 'em...... Let's get us some bad guys"...... and let God sort 'em out...

D
 
iraqivet01 said:
It not Marshall Law, but close.

I get up at 3 am to go to Military training, and it bugs the crap out of me seeing people hanging out or walking around the neighborhood that you know don't live there. Lost a check book a few weeks ago due to someone getting into my car. Didn't lose any money that they wrote from the checks, but it did cost me money stopping payments on those checks, and time away from work going to the bank (twice so far) to do paper work on the checks returned.

I still give it thumbs up.

TO CLOSE :(

No disrespect meant, but you shouldn't leave your check book in your vehicle in the first place - I am glad, however, that it didin't cost you any money, but what a waste of time and effort getting it all cleared up.

And according to the Mayor, the only reason you should be on the streets at 3:00 a.m. is if you are going to the hospital :rolleyes: nice of him to be so generous
 
If the citizens and criminals were equally armed, the citizens would stand a much better chance of not being assaulted by criminals in the first place
 
Wifey said:
If the citizens and criminals were equally armed, the citizens would stand a much better chance of not being assaulted by criminals in the first place

TRU DAT............

D
 
Wifey said:
Maybe if the federal minimum wage was more than $6.55 per hour they wouldn't have to live in such poverty to begin with?







Better idea would be for them to quit PUMPING OUT BABIES that they cannot afford.

It is a proven fact that when you give morons money they just blow it.






.
 
Wifey said:
If the citizens and criminals were equally armed, the citizens would stand a much better chance of not being assaulted by criminals in the first place




NOW YOUR TALKING!!:rock: :congrats:






.
 
Wifey said:
No disrespect meant, but you shouldn't leave your check book in your vehicle in the first place.
In a world the way it should be, you would be able to store your bars of gold on your front yard and know for sure it would be there in the morning. Nobody should touch anything that doesn't belong to them. It disgusts me that people just take other peoples hard earned stuff. Gone are the days of leaving your front door unlocked.
 

Latest posts

Support Us

Become A Supporting Member Today!

Click Here For Details

Back
Top