moparracing
Full Access Member
if 2mm's gives ya 5-10 hp, is it possible to remove more ?jrangel said:It is 65mm.
also, seems to make sense on the twin 65's working better with an NA motor due to the intake turbulance thang.........
if 2mm's gives ya 5-10 hp, is it possible to remove more ?jrangel said:It is 65mm.
moparracing said:if 2mm's gives ya 5-10 hp, is it possible to remove more ?
also, seems to make sense on the twin 65's working better with an NA motor due to the intake turbulance thang.........
seems like they could have removed more material, bigger holes.... oh well.:dontknow:jrangel said:http://www.vtcoa.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=29161&d=1220651981
The link compares both. The BBK is pretty smooth. The stocker looks like it tapers.
moparracing said:seems like they could have removed more material, bigger holes.... oh well.:dontknow:
it's tempting, but $500.00 for 5hp, hmmmm........
i didn't buy either of those ..........jrangel said:What where the gains with the x-metal and Roe? They both had issues for the guys running the stock intake. This is a twin blade the others are single blade.
Stinker said:do they have a part # for the ram specific one yet?
if so i can check an see what I can do on them
Stinker said:do they have a part # for the ram specific one yet?
if so i can check an see what I can do on them
is this the number for an RC, QC or both ?:dontknow:QuickSilver said::rock: BBK-1776 is correct
Quick
moparracing said:is this the number for an RC, QC or both ?:dontknow:
jrangel said:Just a side note. The 10 runs great with this.