Azmotorhead
Full Access Member
1Fast400 I'm with you on this.
Someone stated it earlier
The rear ratio is a multiplication 4.56:1 is a greater multiplier than 4.10:1.
Lets take it to extremes
say you put in a 2.73:1 ratio vs a 4.56:1
The higher numeric ratio multiplies torque quicker than thew numerically lower.
Take a Nascar Stock car for example on a short track they will run a 4.88:1 gear set to get them to the top end faster,look how much wheelspin they get leaving the pits. Now on a Superspeedway they'll run a 3.08:1 or so enabling a higher speed on a longer strech. hardly any of those cars had wheelspin while leaving the pits+ the crews were pushing the car more on exit to "help" the car get rolling
Someone stated it earlier
The rear ratio is a multiplication 4.56:1 is a greater multiplier than 4.10:1.
Lets take it to extremes
say you put in a 2.73:1 ratio vs a 4.56:1
The higher numeric ratio multiplies torque quicker than thew numerically lower.
Take a Nascar Stock car for example on a short track they will run a 4.88:1 gear set to get them to the top end faster,look how much wheelspin they get leaving the pits. Now on a Superspeedway they'll run a 3.08:1 or so enabling a higher speed on a longer strech. hardly any of those cars had wheelspin while leaving the pits+ the crews were pushing the car more on exit to "help" the car get rolling