HOT RAM said:Rudy is pro-choice ,pro gay,and anti 2nd Amendment.
One guess as to who I will NOT be voting for.
I like Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee much better.:rock:
...... I am pretty good at reading body language, and he didn't look very sincere to me. :dontknow: 
You are spot on with your observations,Tim. I lived and worked in Manhattan during the Dinkins administration and it was a failed social experiment. Rudy really whipped the place into shape. In a short time NYC was a different place, for the better. He did the right things for the right reasons, not pandering to a crowd. He also made a name for himself as a get tough, no nonsense prosecutor. Many thought he was a marked man, based on who he went after. That alone, told me he had a pair. nycstev hit it on the head (I'm impressed Steve, a post longer than four wordsDjango said:After seeing the Republican debates the other night, it seems apparent that the guy we need to nominate (i.e. the best qualified to go toe to toe against "the bitch from Hell") seems to be Rudy.....
I was so disappointed with the agility and facility of Fred Thompson in that debate.... I couldn't believe how usure he was of himself... None of the pundits on either side mentioned it... lots reasons why I'm sure... But Fred looked weak for some reason... Not to mention the fact that 3 most dominant words in his vocabulary seem to be "uh", "ah" and "um"..... it's very disquieting and does not engender confidence.
Of all the candidates, Rudy looked great, was quick to answer in a decisive, substantive manner and (as everyone agreed) was focus on the prime directive..... beating "the bitch".....who's name I will not mention...as I just brushed my teeth....
Whomever invitied the quasi-libertarian asshole may have done it for comic relief.... I can't even remember his name..... Oh yeah, "Paul"... what a weenie.
What did you guys think.....?
D
) Anyway I wouldn't have any problem voting for My Guiliani, as I believe he would continue to do what is right for the country, follow the rule of law, and the Constitution. He is a man of deep rooted principle. They will try to bust his balls about his relationships, but who is Clinton to talk. He's up for the job....... PS I think HDTV will destroy Hillary's chances. Wait till you get a good look at her close up
TheSickness said:Well I have something to add although you prolly don't want to hear it. But this election is over Tim. For all intent and purpose that is. The Republicans will lose to whom ever gets the Democratic nod. Reason being George Bush. He cant get out of his own way and has brought that party to it's knees. You got to be kidding me right....Rudy has no shot at all ! He is qualified as a mayor and what else. He can't even carry the most powerful segment of his own party the religious right
People actually believe Hillary will do good....I personally would never vote for her because of her husband. What would make her reign so different from Bill's
joemags54 said:You are spot on with your observations,Tim. I lived and worked in Manhattan during the Dinkins administration and it was a failed social experiment. Rudy really whipped the place into shape. In a short time NYC was a different place, for the better. He did the right things for the right reasons, not pandering to a crowd. He also made a name for himself as a get tough, no nonsense prosecutor. Many thought he was a marked man, based on who he went after. That alone, told me he had a pair. nycstev hit it on the head (I'm impressed Steve, a post longer than four words
uke: But those of us who say this kinda shit just look diminutive in saying so..... I don't rilly give a shit...uke:
We probably don't need another actor for President. We had Reagan (now we Kalifornian's have Arnold for Governor).Django said:
That's good comedy, right there! Yes, Rudy is socially, more liberal than most staunch Rep. Conservatives would like, but soooo what. Who needs the bedroom police anyway? Just as a side bar, coincidentally, there was a report this morning on Fox Cable News, that the heads of the 5 families of New York, had a vote to wack, or not,.... Rudy. (Mentioned in my previous post) The vote went in his favor (obviously), 3-2. You can't make this stuff up!.. PS. This won't come up too often but, Rudy is also a good friend of Israel. The most telling, when he refused the 10 million dollar check from the Arab sheik... He understands and recognizes the enemy like the Israeli's do. Also, much like you D, I would vote for ANYBODY but, you know who.Django said:
Django said:
I would have spelled it FecalBlack1 said:
The Rep's will lose of this I am certain. Bushitis will effect this country for Generations to come NYSteve. Both parties have not one person running that is worth a Shit. Romney a logical choice, however he is Mormon and I am afraid we will have Osama Bin Laden's son elected Pres before he has a chance The election is over fellas wake up and smell the coffee I hate the God Damned Clintons period :nurse:
Great selection, except I don't think politics is his "thing". This is a more difficult question than one would imagine, on first blush. If I had to scream a name out quickly, it might be Newt Gingrich. (alright don't flame me too badly)Django said:
joemags54 said:
But, he really has a genuine concern for this country's future. (GO SANCHOBA! love those stripes)Django said:
joemags54 said:
Brat said:
I will take that bet and counter that Hillery wont get elected.Django said:
Brat said:I will take that bet and counter that Hillery wont get elected.
