Okay, I have researched this as much as I can and am struggling to make a decision on this.
I know with a Paxton the head porting payback is much less than if the heads were going on an NA engine. From all I have read, with a big port job (ie, stage 3), the Paxton is not as easily able to supply to volume of air needed to match the increased flow capabilities.
So, with a stock bottom end, is there any reasonable benefit in putting mildly ported heads (3 or 5 angle valve job, bowl work, smooth port castings, port match to gasket etc.) and extrude honing/port matching the intake manifold. With Paxton, the head might benefit from opening the chamber a bit and making sure the exhaust is ported well.
Can anyone tell me on a bone stock engine, how close the intake manifold and heads match up. Is one typically bigger.
I know it won't hurt to have this done, but it isn't exactly free and will I already be pushing the stock bottom end with a Paxton and water/meth.
Any advice from those that have gone down this road appreciated.
I know with a Paxton the head porting payback is much less than if the heads were going on an NA engine. From all I have read, with a big port job (ie, stage 3), the Paxton is not as easily able to supply to volume of air needed to match the increased flow capabilities.
So, with a stock bottom end, is there any reasonable benefit in putting mildly ported heads (3 or 5 angle valve job, bowl work, smooth port castings, port match to gasket etc.) and extrude honing/port matching the intake manifold. With Paxton, the head might benefit from opening the chamber a bit and making sure the exhaust is ported well.
Can anyone tell me on a bone stock engine, how close the intake manifold and heads match up. Is one typically bigger.
I know it won't hurt to have this done, but it isn't exactly free and will I already be pushing the stock bottom end with a Paxton and water/meth.
Any advice from those that have gone down this road appreciated.