SRT10VENOMOUS said:why would the rough finish be a good thing??... turbulent air is good??
Ironhead said:i would be more worried about that line that runs down the inside ,,,or am i looking at it wrong??and pit marks no freaking way for 7 k
rottenronnie said:Think golf ball.....air over air...
You REALLY don't want a smooth finish in a wet flow port (carb or single point t.b. application)
rottenronnie said:Think golf ball.....air over air...
You REALLY don't want a smooth finish in a wet flow port (carb or single point t.b. application)
SRT10VENOMOUS said:hmmm very neat i never noticed that before, but just checked out the pics of my heads and yep they have a rough intake port and shiny exhaust.. ..
learn something everyday..
rottenronnie said:If you put some gasoline on a plate of glass and blast it with A BIT of air, watch what it does. Now do the same with some gas on sand paper.
With direct port injection, it is less of an issue, well sort of, but back to the fact- Liquid fuel doesn't burn and that is why flow numbers only tell part of the story. High flow heads or those that show improvement in flow can actually make LESS power if air and fuel separate (i.e. if they weren't ported properly).
Good heads do their jobs and can be expensive; but that is where power in an engine is actually made....right?
As the Gen III heads are already factory ported Gen II heads, I would REALLY question porting claims of high quality flow over 300 c.f.m. with those.
There was some interesting info/opinions on Strikers here- http://www.vtcoa.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27790
(I'm a big fan of Strikers in case you couldn't tell....
And dnz28, call Jeff if you don't like what he sent ya...Ronnie would have to agree about flow #'s above 300 CFM on the intake ports on a gen 3.
From what I understand it destroys the flow everywhere but close to full lift.
I have seen a lot of high $ heads destroyed by inexperianced or unknowledgeable porters, flow #'s do not tell the whole story and driveability and torque can go out the window.
It is always good to ask questions on something you do not know about or understand, but be careful of who gives you the answer.![]()
Jeff is the most knowledgeable man in the world with regards to port configuration on how to make HP & TQ on a Viper motor.
dnz28 said:from what he said its no big deal its called porosity(sand falls in the casting). So nothing to worry about, great guy, and his cylinder heads are aswome, cant wait to get them on the truck.
dnz28 said:from what he said its no big deal its called porosity(sand falls in the casting). So nothing to worry about, great guy, and his cylinder heads are aswome, cant wait to get them on the truck.
SRT10VENOMOUS said:quick question? ..
why would sand be falling into the casting, this sounds like a bit of an issue, My bro works at an injection moulding plant designing the machines and moulds for things like this, And that is something that should not be happening..
Im sure the seller will say its no big deal as they do not want to repair or replace the dammaged product . but i certainly would be having them do something about that..
like others have said these are not $500 heads they are $7k Plus and they should per more than perfect for that price.
FSTJACK said:Ronnie would have to agree about flow #'s above 300 CFM on the intake ports on a gen 3.
From what I understand it destroys the flow everywhere but close to full lift.
I have seen a lot of high $ heads destroyed by inexperianced or unknowledgeable porters, flow #'s do not tell the whole story and driveability and torque can go out the window.
It is always good to ask questions on something you do not know about or understand, but be careful of who gives you the answer.![]()
Jeff is the most knowledgeable man in the world with regards to port configuration on how to make HP & TQ on a Viper motor.