If you were the jury how would you vote?..... http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=3511958n
so your saying whites are more apt to shoot first, and blacks are more likly to rob white people's homes? Just want to get that clear. I would have shot the MF's too!!! I dont care what race they were!! If they were kids "under 10/12" i would have aimed for the legs!TheSickness said:I am willing to bet the robbers were not white like the shooter Also willing to bet that had they been white no shots would have been fired. The clip does not say that for some reason, I need more info on this :nurse:
Then again you are in Iowa rightdevildog02 said:so your saying whites are more apt to shoot first, and blacks are more likly to rob white people's homes? Just want to get that clear. I would have shot the MF's too!!! I dont care what race they were!! If they were kids "under 10/12" i would have aimed for the legs!
And how long does it take to get police out there!! he said he had a shotgun! I think the dispatcher droped the ball!! BUT HEY WTF DO I KNOW!! Kill em all and let god sort em out!!! Semper FI, and happy belated birthday!!
He didn't mention a colordevildog02 said:so your saying whites are more apt to shoot first, and blacks are more likly to rob white people's homes? Just want to get that clear. I would have shot the MF's too!!! I dont care what race they were!! If they were kids "under 10/12" i would have aimed for the legs!
And how long does it take to get police out there!! he said he had a shotgun! I think the dispatcher droped the ball!! BUT HEY WTF DO I KNOW!! Kill em all and let god sort em out!!! Semper FI, and happy belated birthday!!
your right!! My mistake! Im not trying to be a jerk, I Just HATE Theives!! And the high school kids who cut up and steal my parents decorations. Dad will be in prison if he catches themWifey said:He didn't mention a color
The news reporter said under TX law it is legal to use deadly force to defend your property. The question here is whether he had the right to defend his neighbor's property.Django said:Most laws dictate that deadly force can only be used when confronted with deadly force..... In other words, if a deadly threat is imminent (someone coming at you to kill you) then you have the right to use deadly force against them....
This guy was repeatedly told by the police dispatcher to stay in his house... he repeatedly insisted on shooting the perps.... He was both right and wrong.... He was right to want to defend his neighbors property, but he was wrong to kill the escaping burglars.... That is, unless they came at him with a weapon... I wasn't there and didn't see what happened at that point...
The audio tape evidence will hurt the man with the shotgun... He really sounds like he has a hardon for these guys....and he did disobey the directions of the police dispatcher on the phone....
I can't render a verdict without more evidence, but this thing went bad because the PR was a hot head......
That's my opinion......
D
Wifey said:The news reporter said under TX law it is legal to use deadly force to defend your property. The question here is whether he had the right to defend his neighbor's property.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1q7mjoxHzm4MYuGiOh Motorsports said:I wish everyone observed, recognized and obeyed that court