tsmith - PM your address I found the Split Second software and made you a copy.
If I remember, Sean said around 22 Hp per additional lb of boost. So with a ten lb pulley you can make around 680 . The problem is when you you go higher than that the lack of intercooling starts to become a factor. The Paxton units have more potential in this area since they DO have an intercooler.LoveThisTruck said:I think I'll be happy with 700I've been told that you can get 14psi with the Roe. Is that realistic?
If I'm at 580hp @ 5.6psi now.... what should I be at with 14psi?
WOLFRAM said:Thanks for bringing this up Alex.
I was expecting higher temps with the Paxton, but WOW!
I was wondering if we could get a list going of what temps people are running, (oil & water at least).
To compare the differences between Paxton, Roe, Single Turbo, and Twin Turbo.
I've only driven my new truck once (to get inspection, about 30 miles).
During this drive the oil hit 240-260, and the water red lined with "check engine" lights. (no codes)
But, It did cool down really quick after I turned it off.
nycstev said:If I remember, Sean said around 22 Hp per additional lb of boost. So with a ten lb pulley you can make around 680 . The problem is when you you go higher than that the lack of intercooling starts to become a factor. The Paxton units have more potential in this area since they DO have an intercooler.
JMB Justin said:IMO the Roe is a great setup out of the box, tons of low end like these trucks need, but the intake manifold, not the lack of intercooling, is the problem, it simply is not designed to flow more than the low boost levels the kits come with. This is not in any way a slam on Roe, the kit works excellent AS DESIGNED, but many are trying to take it outside the design limits. I have seen the VERY extensive work Joe at PBJ has done on Dales intake manifold and the endless hours of R+R and it is still the weak link. Think about it, a gen 2 with less ci and heads that dont flow as well, can make 650+ on 8psi with a 2.4L blower. The SRT ram kit uses a 3.3L blower and a heads/cam 12psi truck (with a good tuner) only made 700whp, a gen 2 with H/C and 12 psi would be closer to 800 with the smaller blower and less ci. Neither are intercooled setups and the smaller blower should almost always create more heat. Until an alternate intake design is figured out, dont plan on seeing any 800WHP Roe setups anytime soon IMO.
Justin
fursale said:I am thinking about removing my rear cats for a better sound.
I currently have a stage 2 x-metal flash 93 tune and borla exhaust with stock manifolds.
How much louder will this be and would this be an issue as far as warranty to the dealer.
Also would a re flash be needed.
Thanks.
4to10cyl said:A reflash would be needed as you'd throw cat efficiency codes. A reflash could take care of that.
Tooloe said:Now i know this has been brought up some time Before but does Port matching your intake to your heads really help you gain any HP? it seems like it should but what is yall thought on it?
Stinker said:it does help bro, how much it helps ? dont know, i would think around 10-20hp?