i wouldn't expect to hear anythin untill around 8 pm my time(central) so 6 west coast time, it always takes longer than you expect
Ported Intake Manifold Results
- Thread starter Trainman
- Start date
Begood
Full Access Member
Anything yet?
Bill.
Bill.
:bebored: :bebored:
Begood
Full Access Member
Something doesn't seem right. Srtbrad and Trainman have both been on here tonight, but haven't posted any updates. I hope nothing bad happened.
Bill.
Bill.
SrtBrad
Michel Productions
Just got back from my son's B Ball practice. The results are in however I wanted Jerry to let everyone know the results since this is his deal not mine. Maybe Jerry will post up soon.:dontknow:
Begood
Full Access Member
OK, well thank you for that.SrtBrad said:
Bill.
SrtBrad said:
Jerk
SrtBrad
Michel Productions
Begood said:
So how does it feel to have 9000 posts?
SrtBrad
Michel Productions
kyle's srt10 said:Jerk
Thanks You.
SrtBrad
Michel Productions
Just spoke with Jerry. He'll be posting up soon and I'll post up some video tomorrow.
SrtBrad said:
:marchmellow: :marchmellow: :marchmellow:
dnz28
Full Access Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2008
- Messages
- 189
- Reaction score
- 0
:slug: :slug: :marchmellow: :marchmellow: :turtle: :coffee:
Sorry for the slight delay...I had a 2 hour racketball match..Old grampa needs his workout....gotta keep those reflexes sharp. Brad and I were a little disappointed at the peak numbers but after digesting some of the data I feel this intake will make a real difference at the track. After consulting with Chris @ DC Performance (he did the tune) we feel that the 3rd pull yesterday for a baseline and the 5th pull today were the most comparible due to outside temp., engine temp , etc...in other words the best comparible data. This will take a while, but I will summerize here and then try to post the data in a seperate posting to try to get the columns to line up. Basically the ported intake made a little less HP below 3800 RPM to the tune of from 1 to 5 HP. After 3800 RPM it averaged 8 to 10 HP more from 4500 to 6000 RPM. Hey 10 HP is 1/10th...Yea! When I'm making a run and power shifting I rarely drop below 5000 RPM. On the torque side the stock intake made roughly the same as the ported from idle to about 2000 RPM then from 2500 to 4000 it averaged about 9 Ftlbs more than the ported intake. Peak torque for my engine is at 4200 RPM and both manifolds were equal at that RPM. From 4500 to 6000 RPM the ported intake averaged 8 Ftlbs more. Those are real gains under the torque curve for the high end. Now I will try to put the data in chart form. Sorry this is so long, but after initial disappointment (only 10 HP) I was pleased with the power gains under the curve. I expect that I will gain even a little more when I am running at the track and "Ramming" the air in through my Volant Ram Air rather than sitting static on a dyno with no air ramming in.
Last edited:
______HORSEPOWER ____________ TORQUE
_____
RPM___STOCK _PORTED_ DIFF___ STOCK_PORTED _ DIFF____
2000 ___ 172 ___ 172 ____ 0 ___ 452 ___ 452___ 0
2500 ___ 230 ___ 226 ___ -4 ____ 483 ___ 474___ -9
3000 ___ 276 ___ 271 ___ -5 ____ 483 ___ 474___ -9
3500 ___ 338 ___ 332 ___ -6 ____ 507 ___ 499___ -8
4000 ___ 399 ___ 400 ___ +1 ____ 523 ___ 525___ +2
4200 ___ 424 ___ 424 ___ 0 ____ 530 ___ 531___ +1
4500 ___ 445 ___ 453 ___ +8 ____ 520 ___ 528___ +8
5000 ___ 471 ___ 481 ___ +10____ 495 ___ 505___ +10
5500 ___ 487 ___ 495 ___ +8 ____ 465 ___ 473___ +8
5700 ___ 491 ___ 498 ___ +7 ____ 453 ___ 459___ +6
5800 ___ 493___ 501 ___ +8 ____ 446 ___ 454___ +8
5900 ___ 490___ 499 ___ +9 ____ 436 ___ 444___ +8
6000 ___ 493 ___ 502 ___ +9 ____ 432 ___ 440___ +8
This is the best I can do , The spacing changes when you post....Sorry , but the data is there. I will try to get Brad to do a better spread sheet.
_____
RPM___STOCK _PORTED_ DIFF___ STOCK_PORTED _ DIFF____
2000 ___ 172 ___ 172 ____ 0 ___ 452 ___ 452___ 0
2500 ___ 230 ___ 226 ___ -4 ____ 483 ___ 474___ -9
3000 ___ 276 ___ 271 ___ -5 ____ 483 ___ 474___ -9
3500 ___ 338 ___ 332 ___ -6 ____ 507 ___ 499___ -8
4000 ___ 399 ___ 400 ___ +1 ____ 523 ___ 525___ +2
4200 ___ 424 ___ 424 ___ 0 ____ 530 ___ 531___ +1
4500 ___ 445 ___ 453 ___ +8 ____ 520 ___ 528___ +8
5000 ___ 471 ___ 481 ___ +10____ 495 ___ 505___ +10
5500 ___ 487 ___ 495 ___ +8 ____ 465 ___ 473___ +8
5700 ___ 491 ___ 498 ___ +7 ____ 453 ___ 459___ +6
5800 ___ 493___ 501 ___ +8 ____ 446 ___ 454___ +8
5900 ___ 490___ 499 ___ +9 ____ 436 ___ 444___ +8
6000 ___ 493 ___ 502 ___ +9 ____ 432 ___ 440___ +8
This is the best I can do , The spacing changes when you post....Sorry , but the data is there. I will try to get Brad to do a better spread sheet.
Last edited:
looks good... power where ya need it
- Joined
- May 18, 2006
- Messages
- 27,423
- Reaction score
- 4,858
AWESOME Jerry!!! :rock: :rock: :rock:
To start with, it "looks" fantastic :marchmellow:
We all know RED trucks are faster than the rest, but your #'s prove that
I wouldn't be disappointed with those numbers - it looks like there is increase where you need it and I'm sure combined with the "Trainman power shift" you wil be rolling right along at the track. Great job done by everyone who worked on it - :congrats: :congrats: :congrats:
and of course Brad's video is top of the line as usual.
WAY TO GO - now get to shiftin
To start with, it "looks" fantastic :marchmellow:
We all know RED trucks are faster than the rest, but your #'s prove that
I wouldn't be disappointed with those numbers - it looks like there is increase where you need it and I'm sure combined with the "Trainman power shift" you wil be rolling right along at the track. Great job done by everyone who worked on it - :congrats: :congrats: :congrats:
and of course Brad's video is top of the line as usual.
WAY TO GO - now get to shiftin
Ironhead...No change was needed with the tune, its exactly where Chris tuned about 2 1/2 years ago.
Begood
Full Access Member
Thank you for the info. Hi performance is always a learning experience.
Bill.
Bill.
Support Us
Become A Supporting Member Today!
